Should Big Tech be broken up? We’ve long approached this question with skepticism. Modern tech platforms function as infrastructure, and blunt government intervention often creates more problems than it solves.
In a new episode of #ShimmySays, Alan Shimel explores where the argument for breaking up #BigTech becomes more nuanced. Not as punishment. Not as political theater. But as a question of competition, incentives, and long-term market health. What if targeted separation could strengthen innovation instead of weakening it?
Tune in at 2:30 p.m. ET to watch the full episode and join the debate!
Up Next in Season 1
-
The World According to Me | Shimmy Sa...
Tech isn’t evolving right now. It’s colliding. AI datacenter economics are cracking, AWS re:Invent turned into an AI monolith, VCs are levitating, robots are stepping into the real world, and people keep declaring “the cloud is dead” while quietly running everything on it.In today’s #ShimmySays, ...
-
DevOps Isn’t Dead: re:Invent Shows Cl...
Everyone walked into re:Invent expecting one story: AI everywhere. And yes, AWS pushed agenticAI, new models, new chips, and an “AI factory” vision hard. But the work happening on the floor told a different story. DevOps, CloudNative and PlatformEngineering weren’t sidelined. They were packed and...
-
Innovation Will Find a Way | Shimmy S...
We’ve reached a point where Big Tech’s hunger for control is strangling the very innovation that built it. In this episode of Shimmy Says, Alan Shimel calls it like it is—tech giants are milking the system while pretending to build the future. It’s time to bring back real creativity, invest local...
